User talk:Pvasiliadis
Welcome
[edit]Hello, welcome to Wikipedia.
You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)
Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.
Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.
You might find these links helpful in creating new pages or helping with the above tasks: How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Naming conventions, Manual of Style. You should read our policies at some point too.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
- If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
- You can sign your name using three tildes ~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
Again, welcome! - <>Who?¿? 2 July 2005 08:52 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Bible Greek Vamvas Jehovah.JPG
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Bible Greek Vamvas Jehovah.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096(block) 21:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Bible Greek Vamvas Jehovah.JPG
[edit]
|
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Bible Greek Vamvas Jehovah.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rory096(block) 21:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:World map pol 2005 v02 GRK.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:World map pol 2005 v02 GRK.svg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick John Foakes-Jackson, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.questia.com/library/encyclopedia/foakes_jackson_frederick_john.jsp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
CfD nomination of Category:Files by User:Pvasiliadis from el.wikipedia
[edit]
Category:Files by User:Pvasiliadis from el.wikipedia, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon (Talk) 23:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Article to be deleted
[edit]HELP. This article to be deleted in id.wiki. Can you help me to SAY KEEP in its Talk page, in Indonesia Wikipedia. I don't know why they don't appreciate Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, and Assembly. Thanks for your support. Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Jehovah's Witnesses lead section and infobox
[edit]Your edits to the intro of the Jehovah's Witnesses]] article are, as already explained, unacceptable given the lengthy discussion about the content and the eventual agreement. Here are some points to consider:
(1) Jesus Christ is no more the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses that he is of Mormonism (founder: Joseph Smith), Christian Science (founder: Mary Baker Eddy) or Seventh Day Adventism (founders: Joseph Bates, James White, Ellen G. White, etc). Each religion began with someone’s teaching ... though it's possible that within each religion there are people who also claim that Jesus moved these individuals to start their interpretations. At each article, however, the foounder is named, without Christ's name being mentioned. Without C. T. Russell, Jehovah’s Witnesses would not exist today. The point of the encyclopedia article is to identify the person who began the movement and in this case it was clearly Russell.
(2) Your addition of the phrase though terms like "sect" or "cult" are "negatively connotated" ones or imply a religious "orthodoxy" is your opinion and can’t remain.
(3) Your addition of “their peaceful attitudes” into the sentence about what the characteristics and activities for which religion is most well known is also your opinion. LTSally (talk) 01:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Question
[edit]For what editing activities were you banned on the greek wikipedia? carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 17:59, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Jehovah's Witnesses project
[edit]I have started a discussion regarding the content wikipedia has regarding the Jehovah's Witnesses at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Jehovah's Witnesses#Comments regarding template and project. Seeing that you are listed as a member of that project, I would appreciate any responses to the material there you would like to make. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. -- pvasiliadis 18:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Article Alexander Thomson nominated for deletion
[edit]Article Alexander Thomson nominated for deletion
If you're familiar with the range of Wikipedia articles about Jehovah's Witnesses, you've likely come across the name Alexander Thomson a few times. He wasn't a Witness, but he (very) occasionally had favorable things to write about Watch Tower publications. By no means was he a shill.
Someone (see diff) has moved to delete the article about Thomson, claiming that he is not notable (is not worthy of even a brief encyclopedic article). That seems odd to me, because Thomson is listed among only twelve persons having "played a significant role in the work of the Concordant Publishing Concern", publishers of the Concordant Literal Version of the Bible. He edited and wrote much Bible commentary under his own bylines, some of which is still in print. He contributed and edited articles in Unsearchable Riches[1] (now in its 100th year). Primarily because of having had his scholarship so substantially influence a notable Bible, Thomson is himself notable.
I have no sentimental attachment to Thomson, but I believe he is notable enough to keep from deletion. Feel free to add references to improve the article, or chime at the article's Talk regarding whether or not you'd prefer Wikipedia delete its article about this Alexander Thomson.--AuthorityTam (talk) 17:13, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- I will keep an eye on this discussion, thank you. -- pvasiliadis 20:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Article Tetragrammaton
[edit]The phrasing and concept "personal name of God" is somewhat anachronistic, since it does not entirely accurately represent Jewish thought of the Biblical or the Rabbinic periods -- and furthermore, in the modern period it is strongly identified with the particular ideology and theology of one specific relatively small group. For these reasons, the phrase would best be completely avoided in the overview article Tetragrammaton (though it may have a place in other articles in different contexts)... AnonMoos (talk) 02:51, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Furthermore, Biblical Hebrew simply did not have a "v" sound as a pronunciation of the sixth letter of the Hebrew alphabet, period, end of story, that's all she wrote. The matter is not open to legitimate dispute among mainstream reputable scholars... AnonMoos (talk) 02:56, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
See the discussion at Talk:Tetragrammaton#Recent changes.
Dude, do not delete other people's comments from an article talk page, unless it's pure vandalism, or there's some other highly-specific urgent valid reason... AnonMoos (talk) 12:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Replied at User_talk:AnonMoos#Deleted_comment
Grammar
[edit]Please note the correct distinction between "since" and "although". Saying JWs prefer Jehovah "since there is no certainty" suggests that they use the name Jehovah specifically because there is ambiguity. That is not the case. They prefer the name Jehovah "although" (i.e. "despite the fact that") there is ambiguity.--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- My reply is here. -- pvasiliadis 11:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Marsyas image
[edit]Hi, Pvasiliadis. Could you visit Talk:Marsyas and help with the discussion of images? I noticed your contribution. I like the exaggerated verticality of the image you added in terms of graphic effect, but would like your views on the overall coordination of image and text. Cynwolfe (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Christian cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Robert Harley
- Instrument of Jesus' crucifixion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Thomas Godwin
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
March 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bible translations into Greek may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ]''. Then, in 1997, they released the complete ''Holy Scriptures'' (Bible) in modern Greek,<ref> [http://wol.jw.org/el/wol/binav/r11/lp-g/bi12/G/1997 ''Η Αγία Γραφή—Μετάφραση Νέου Κόσμου''</ref>,
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Pvasiliadis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pvasiliadis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The file File:World map pol 2005 v02 GRK.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Orphaned map.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob13Talk 17:30, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Worths remaining because in el.wiki there is not any such a reference map. pvasiliadis 20:53, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pvasiliadis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
AfD - Names and titles of God in the New Testament
[edit]Names and titles of God in the New Testament has been nominated for deletion. If this is an article you may have an interest in, you are invited to comment at [2]. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 19:37, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Gérard Gertoux
[edit]Dear Pvasiliadis, I hope you are well. Let me tell you that I have previously added text on G. Gertoux's claims, but have received strong opposition from other editors. Currently I have been working on Draft: Gérard Gertoux, and I would like to add it as an article already, but I think it needs fixing, and the truth is that I have limitations. I would be very grateful if you can support me, and if you have some time available. Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 00:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Dear Jairon, if there is any specific inquiry, please inform me. -- pvasiliadis 08:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- In case you are interested, perhaps Gérard Gertoux is a biography for [inclusionism], since it has been nominated for deletion.--Jairon Levid Abimael Caál Orozco (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Anthemus (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. Pvasiliadis (talk) 21:44, 5 October 2024 (UTC)